Calling All Scholars

Related image

Most of us who are book folks are readers and collectors.  We may read a lot and know quite a bit, but we are still amateurs and samplers.  There is nothing wrong with being a person who loves reading.  That love of books and reading translates into different things for all kinds of people.  I come across shelves of books in people’s homes that include almost nothing I would want to have or read.  Many of my favorite books and authors would have no appeal to them.

There are, at the same time, people who are by profession and training deemed scholars.  I am not one.  I do, however, press my nose against the glass and watch them work.  I don’t have the academic training, the acute sense of distinctions, and the narrow pursuits that characterize these people.  Most academic scholars are professors and teachers in colleges and universities.  They had to focus time and attention on particular specializations and prove a mastery of a subject.  Sure, we might quip that a doctoral student learns more and more about less and less until he knows virtually everything about absolutely nothing.  And, I can console myself in my lack of academic training by saying that my interests were too broad and that I did not want to be constrained by the strictures of academia.

Maybe there is a need for someone to call academic scholars to account, but I am not that person.  I like and admire and even envy what they do without necessarily regretting not following that pursuit.  One thing that characterizes scholars and scholarship is writing.  Men and women with PhD.’s write lots of books.  University presses pour out thousands of books each year.  The books range in size, topic, readability, and interest across the board in terms of topics and styles of writing.

It is easy enough to find some obscure, arcane, and even dreadful topic that gets put into a book and published by an academic press.  I can make up titles like Tariff Concerns in Unionization Conflicts among Irish Immigrants in New York during the 1890s, but even that title is too popular-sounding to compete with actual publications.

I have quite a few sources for academic publications whose books I routinely acquire and love.  I receive lots of books from Oklahoma University Press, which publishes a series called Campaigns and Commanders, which is outstanding.  Any book titled The Oxford Book of __________________ gets my attention.  Many southern university presses have published loads of books about the Agrarians and southern literary figures.  Any time I am rifling through a stack of cheap books and find university press publications, I give those books heavy consideration.

Take note of several details regarding university presses and their publications:

  1.  They are generally expensive.  Often, they are priced completely out of range for the average buyer.  $95 is not an unusual price for such books.  The reason is that many such works have a limited appeal and will be purchased mainly by university libraries.  It costs a fortune to publish one copy of a book, and that price decreases more and more as the number of copies increases.  The best seller that goes for $25 probably costs about $3 to publish.  That’s economics and the laws of supply and demand.
  2. University press publications are usually high quality in terms of paper and binding.  That also is a factor that drives the price up.
  3. University press publications are usually heavily footnoted and contain lots of bibliographical material.  That is usually a plus to me.
  4. University press publications are often narrow and specialized in their appeal.  Is that good or bad?  Depends.  I really don’t want a book on the American Civil War.  I already have hundreds of them.  But a book on that part of the battle for Atlanta, Georgia known as the Battle of Ezra Church is of some interest.

OUPress.Data.Entities.Image

5.  Scholars who write for university presses have differing levels of writing ability and appeal to audiences.  Some are scholars who write for scholars.  Some are really hard for the average and non-specialized reader to follow.  Many assume a degree of familiarity with the topic that most of us do not have.  But there are academics, such as Niall Ferguson, Simon Schama, Thomas Kidd, and Thomas Foster, whose writing is quite enjoyable and attainable by more general readers.

All that being said, let me share a few readings and studies from scholarly publications that I read and/or attempted this past year.

Image result for the old english epic of waldere

Some time back, I got to meet Dr. Jonathan Himes who teaches at John Brown University in Siloam Springs, Arkansas.  I also got to attend one of his English classes where he was teaching on Ovid.  Dr. Himes has also written some scholarly works related to his teaching fields and interests.  The book The Old English Epic of Waldere is one such work.  No, you will not find this on the best sellers’ list or at your local bookstore.  It does cost quite a bit for a small book.  To offset its small size, it is really well bound and is a detailed enough read that one does have to devote some serious time to it.

I am a late convert to anything Old English.  In fact, I am not all that many years past that age of ignorance where I might have described the King James Bible as being Old English.  (And I would have been certain that Chaucer’s work was Old English.)  My teaching career hinges upon lots of repentance and lots of retracing the roots of what I thought I knew.

For inexplicable reasons, I never read Beowulf in high school or college.  I upbraided a high school students once who called it stupid, but even then had not read it.  I now rank it as one of the pivotal and most important works of literature.  I love reading Beowulf, teaching the poem, gathering translations of it, and contrasting it with the interesting movie 13th Warrior.

But Beowulf is not complete and neither was it the only poem to exist in its time.  The heartbreak of reading Himes’ work on Waldere is that only a small fragment of that poems exists.  One can hope that some archival dig in some old library or monastery or cave in Britain will someday yield a much larger, if not complete, copy of this poem.

Both poems present an England that is being slowly Christianized.  Himes writes, “…the Waldere poet posits a hero who, like Beowulf, is not only the greatest champion of his people, but also the greatest moral example of the pagan world.”  The greater concept of heroes is a critical one for all of life.  We might tend to think of heroes as simply useful character-types for movies and certain kinds of books.  But it seems as if we as people cannot exist without some sort of heroic figures.  Day by day life calls for something or someone who transcends the ordinary, who inspires, leads, and models a way of handling circumstances that changes us.

The Anglo-Saxons of days long gone had a rich and complex world and worldview.  Tolkien upended all Beowulf studies when he argued that the poem contained structures and themes make it real literature.  It was not just a glimpse into old ways of warriors.  Anglo-Saxon warfare is interesting enough, and this book has a marvelous appendix devoted to weapons and wargear.

This book is a really useful supplement and resource for teachers and students of Beowulf and Anglo-Saxon history.  It is a fun glimpse at the scholarly work that goes into drawing out the words and meanings from a few damaged leaves of a manuscript.  Dr. Himes told me that he hopes to see a cheaper, more accessible version of this work put into print.  I would hope so, but until then, this small work is a useful and enjoyable gem.

One final quote:  “Waldere‘s scale of heroic action, its proportions of triumphant themes, and its tone of a Christian ethos clearly portray Walter as a hero of unequaled epic status, one whom Anglo-Saxon audiences may have celebrated even more widely than the protagonist of Beowulf.”

Image result for fatal land

I have previously reviewed The Fatal Land: War, Empire, and the Highland Soldier in British America in this blog.  Once again, I will be a name dropper and mention that I could Dr. Dziennik as a friend.  What I hate to admit is that he is a model scholar to a degree that leaves me in the role of student.  I suspected soon after I met him that he would begin to emerge in the world of historical research and writing.  For various reasons, some of the best historians are still being trained in the United Kingdom, the University of Edinburgh in Dziennik’s case, and then they cross the pond to teach in American universities.

The book’s title whets the appetite for a rousing read about kilt-wearing Scots, with pipes rousing them to a fighting pitch, plunging forth into battle and wailing away at Frenchies, Spaniards, Indians, and, awkward to admit, American Patriots.  One expects a book with a Mel Gibson-like hero combining the roles of William Wallace and Benjamin Martin (the hero in the movie The Patriot).

But Dr. Dziennik wrote this book as part of his research for obtaining a doctorate in history, and that labor sometimes cuts off the flow of a version of popular history that we would all like to believe.  The Scots, particularly the Highlanders, have had an uneasy history within the greater British (or could we say English?) Empire.  Scotland isn’t exactly the most hospitable land for surviving and thriving.  The military and the prospects of land and settlement in British America were both incentives for Highlanders.

In spite of the myth of the “Fighting Scots,” the Scots soldiers were not natural or inborn with martial skills.  This book is a carefully researched reconstruction of what motivated and sustained the Scottish soldiers.  Granted, such historical “matter of fact” may tarnish some of our love of the glory of the past, but historians are not primarily entertainers.

I would encourage any serious student wanting to major in history, teach or write history, or get a graduate degree in history to carefully read this book.  There is method to the manner of this book.  This is the kind of research that is necessary to get behind the broad brush painting that so many of us enjoy about history.  It calls for more sweat and the upending of some cherished beliefs, but that is the task of the historian.

Image result for jonathan chaplain dooyeweerd

An important study of Herman Dooyeweerd can be found in Jonathan Chaplin’s book Herman Dooyeweerd: Christian Philosopher of State and Civil Society.  One of the biggest questions I have struggled to answer is this:  Which is harder–books written by Dooyeweerd or books written about Dooyeweerd?

First, a little background.  Herman Dooyeweerd was a Dutch philosopher who lived from 1894 to 1977.  Since he wrote in Dutch, the process of getting his works into English and then into accessible formats has taken some time.  He was a Christian with a strong Reformed (or Calvinistic) background.  His philosophy is built upon Christian foundations and his school of thought is often called Neo-Calvinism (not to be confused with New Calvinism).

Dooyeweerd had a big influence on quite a few Christian thinkers including Cornelius Van Til, R. J. Rushdoony, H. R. Rookmaaker, Nancy Pearcey, and Roy Clouser.  His followers continue to write about, debate, and explore his thought and its applications to a range of philosophical, theological, political, and social questions.  Here are a few testimonials to his influence:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Dr. P.B. Cliteur, wrote in 1994: “Herman Dooyeweerd is undoubtedly the most formidable Dutch philosopher of the 20th century.”                                                            G.E. Langemeijer, attorney general of the Dutch Appeal Court and chairman of the Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences, wrote that Dooyeweerd was “the most original philosopher Holland has ever produced, even Spinoza not excepted.”                                                                                                                                                                         Giorgio Delvecchio, an Italian neo-Kantian philosopher, viewed Dooyeweerd as “the most profound, innovative, and penetrating philosopher since Kant. ”                Philosopher Alvin Plantinga stated that “Dooyeweerd’s work was comprehensive, insightful, profound, courageous, and quite properly influential.”

I have been attempting to climb Mount Dooyeweerd for some years now.  Each time I attack the books by and about Dooyeweerd, I get a little closer to understanding him.  This particular book is one that I started a few years ago and then bogged down around page 30.  Now I am making another run at this work.  I plan on reading it all the way through this time.  If I don’t understand it, then I will read it again–Lord willing.

 

Image result for herman dooyeweerd

Dr. Dooyeweerd looks a little doubtful that I will ever make succeed in truly understanding him.

The world of scholarship is extraterrestrial for me in many respects.  It would be easier and more accessible if I honed in on one area.  These books deal with Anglo-Saxon literature and history, British culture and the Highland Scots experience in the American colonies, and the political thought of a 20th century Dutch Christian philosopher.  At the very least, I can enjoy the efforts at reading these kinds of works.

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s