Frank on the Prairie–And Being 12 Years Old Again

Boy reading forest

I was recently listening to a cassette tape  from the Easy Chair series that R. J. Rushdoony did, often with Otto Scott.  In this talk, Otto Scott commented on Homer’s Odyssey, saying, “When I read The Odyssey, I am a twelve year boy old again.”  I loved that comment, even though I did not read and love Homer’s epics until much later.  For me, it is such books as Jesse Stuart’s Hie to the Hunters  that recreates that feeling.  There were other books I loved such as Smokey–The Cow Horse by Will James and The Dog Who Wouldn’t Be by Farley Mowat.

Also, every time I teach through The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, I find myself wishing I could sneak out the window of the classroom and go join Tom and Huck on Jackson Island and play pirates all day.

Image result for tom and huck on jackson island

A few years back, my son Nate and I enjoyed reading Scout: The Secret of the Swamp by Piet Prins.  Published by Inheritance Press, out of Canada, this series told of the adventures of a young boy and his German Shepherd dog Scout.  In spite of being a German Shepherd, Scout is totally committed to the Dutch people and the Christian family he is a part of.  Inheritance Press publisher Roelof Jannsen brilliantly published this book along with his catalog together.  It led to several good book purchases, including more volumes of the Scout Series.

Image result for scout series inheritance press

The book with a hook. Read it and you will want all of the series.

You might be surprised that I grew up in a home that did not have many books.  I only randomly and haphazardly picked up hints and helps as to what to read.  In our house, we had lots of old Reader’s Digest magazines, along with Texas Horseman magazines, and we had a copy of a book called None Dare Call It Treason, which always seemed scary to me.  I did check out books from the school library, but never read the Hardy Boys, any Henty books, Edgar Rice Burroughs, or other authors I should have digested before I went to high school.

Long life and a desire to learn calls for frequent repentance and acts of penance.  While I have acquired a decent amount of book smarts, there are still so many authors I barely know and book titles I may not recognize.  We won’t even begin to think about books I read that should be read again.

I recently received a beautiful little book titled Frank on the Prairie by Harry Castlemon with additional illustrations by Charles M. Russell.  The book is published by one of my favorite sources–the University of Oklahoma Press.


The University of Oklahoma Press website states that they publish scholarly books, “especially Native American studies, classics, natural history, and regional interest titles.”  That is certainly true, and I have enjoyed many of the classical studies and the Campaigns and Commanders series, which has over 50 current volumes with more to come.

But they also publish books that the average reader, who has no academic pursuit in mind, can read and enjoy.  A few months back, I reviewed Horseback Schoolmarm, Montana 1953-1954, which I and my wife both thoroughly enjoyed.

Frank On The Prairie is also going to be a fun book.  (I am still early into it.)  It is a reprint (the original book came out in 1869) of an author of adventure books for boys named Harry Castlemon, who was the most popular author of boys adventure books in the late 1800s .  The review on the website says this:

The prolific author of the novel Frank on the Prairie, Charles Austin Fosdick (1842–1915), who went by the pen name Harry Castlemon, was one of Russell’s favorite storytellers. Castlemon’s book, which first appeared in 1868 as part of the Gunboat Series of Books for Boys, recounts the adventures of young Frank and his friend Archie as they travel across the Old West.

Charles Austin Fosdick, who wrote under the name Harry Castlemon

In this case, there was a boy named Austin whose uncle was Charles M. Russell, the man who was one of the greatest artists of the Old West.  Russell was also a fan and collector of Castleman’s “Frank Series” (there were at least 9 books about Frank).  Uncle Charles borrowed Austin’s book and later returned it with eleven watercolors and a pencil sketch detailing events in the book.

Western artist Charles M. Russell

I find myself astounded and in awe of that.  You see, I don’t really like loaning books unless the borrower is as careful as I am.  I sure don’t like when they mark up the book or do things to it.  (I don’t even want them to let sunlight get to it.)  But this would be like loaning a book of poetry to C. S. Lewis and having him return it with notes in it.  Or loaning a book on World War II to Churchill and him marking the places where he was present in the story.

This book is a great adventure story.  After all, if you have two young boys who are heading out west–the book depends heavily on Francis Parkman’s Oregon Trail–and the book is not adventurous, then you ain’t no writer!

Add to that, the greatest artist of the Old West just happens to enhance the book with illustrations.  It just doesn’t get much better than this.  This fine book has been published now–illustrations and all–in a beautiful, facsimile hardcover edition.  This is a book for collectors, lovers of the Old West, lovers of boys adventure stories, and lovers of fine books.

Yea, it is not being given away, but it would be a great investment for any book lover and would be a great gift to young people who need some good reading.  It would also be good for all of us who want to feel like we are twelve again.

Proceeds from the book will go to the C. M. Russell Museum–The Art and Soul of the Old West in Great Falls, Montana.

Postscript:  Harry Castlemon wrote,  “Boys don’t like fine literature. What they want is adventure, and the more of it you can get in two-hundred-fifty pages of manuscript, the better fellow you are.”

Gordon Clark’s Many Books

No automatic alt text available.

With thanks and envy to George Grant for use of this picture of his Clark collection.

If Gordon Clark has been somewhat forgotten, ignored, and overlooked in our times, we certainly cannot blame him for that.  He didn’t just write a book or two.  He wrote quite a few books and extended essays that were published in his day.  Since his death, many of his remaining unpublished and uncollected writings have been published in book form.  He was prolific and scholarly and able to comment on a wide range of topics.  All that being said, his works and thoughts have been neglected in the decades following his death.

How important was he?  When asked which theologian from our times would be read in 500 years, R. C. Sproul said, “Gordon Clark.”  (But don’t wait that long to start.) Why has his star dimmed or why is he not more noticed, respected, and read?  Read Douglas Douma’s fine biography of Gordon Clark, titled Gordon Clark: Presbyterian Philosopher, and it will detail the controversies, issues, and convictions that made Clark who he was but also contributed to his lack of popularity.

The Presbyterian Philosopher

I reviewed that book earlier this year and am still singing its praises.  However, in this post, I want to explore the roles of two men (primarily) and two publishing firms that promoted Gordon Clark’s books.

One of the most fascinating Christian works of the twentieth century was the creation of a publishing house in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and later Nutley, New Jersey called Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.  It was started by Samuel Craig, himself an interesting man and author, and was continued by his son, Charles, and later, his grandson, Bryce.  The son was Charles Craig (1912-1983)–one of my heroes.

Charles H. Craig

Charles H. Craig approved and published books by a number of Christian scholars, most of whom were Reformed.

Mr. Craig must have had some really deep convictions about Christian books, doctrines, and thought, along with no sense of how to make money publishing books.  From 1957, when he took over the family business, until his death in 1983, Presbyterian and Reformed published a number of heavy, weighty, often lengthy, serious books on a wide range of topics.  Long before “Christian worldview” became a catchphrase among Christian schools, home schools, and Christian campuses, Craig was producing the works that provided solid intellectual foundations for Christian thought.  These were not books that would have appealed to a wide audience or that were easy beach reads.  (For example, one of the publications was a book by the late William Young, titled Hegel’s Dialectic Method: Its Origins and Religious Significance.)

I have heard that Craig himself was not a deep thinker or reader, but he certainly became the instrumental means of many Christian thinkers getting their ideas into print.  There was a time when creationism or creation science or 6 day creation had virtually no adherents or defenders in the evangelical publishing world.  Then Craig published The Genesis Flood, which has remained in print for over 50 years.  By the way, this event happened after R. J. Rushdoony read the manuscript (which other publishers had rejected) and pressed Craig to publish the book.

He also published the counseling books by Jay E. Adams, theological studies by Oswald T. Allis and Benjamin Warfield, historical studies by C. Gregg Singers, works opposing Communism on a Christian and philosophical level by James D. Bales (a Church of Christ scholar) and Francis Nigel Lee, books on Christian philosophy by William Young and David Freeman, books on eastern religions (such as Zen Existentialism: The Spiritual Decline of the West by Lit-Sen Chang), Gary North’s books on economics, Greg Bahnsen’s Theonomy in Christian Ethics, and many works extolling Calvinistic and Reformed views of salvation.

There was a whole series of relatively short monographs called the Modern Thinkers Series.  These books covered such people as Freud, Nietzsche, Toynbee, William James, Rudolf Bultmann, and others.  The authors of this series were among the top Calvinist thinkers of their age, including R. J. Rushdoony, H. Van Reissen, Gregg Singer, Gordon Clark, and others.  (This whole series deserves to be reprinted and packaged in a good hardback set.)  Another series was called the University Series:  Philosophical Studies, and those volumes, many of which I have acquired, are still great studies and were really helpful to me in years past.

Image result for j. m. spier books       Image result for craig press in the twilight of western thought      Image result for craig press university series

Men who later became associated with theological and cultural wars were published by Presbyterian and Reformed during those decades that James Jordan referred to in his essay “The Closing of the Calvinistic Mind”  and that I referred to in past writings and lectures as “Calvinistic Worldview Thinkers in the Wilderness Years.”

High on the list of authors that P & R (which is both an abbreviation and now the new name of the company) published was R. J. Rushdoony.  In time, many would shy away from or attack Rushdoony over aspects of Christian Reconstruction.  But for a long time, P & R was publishing and promoting mind-changing and thought-provoking works by Rushdoony on American history, politics, science, overpopulation, education, philosophy, and theology.  In 1973, P & R published Rushdoony’s monumental work The Institutes of Biblical Law, Volume 1. P & R still carries that title.  (Regardless of one’s perspective, this book is essential reading and a necessary reference work.)

It was P & R that promoted most of the early English translations of the work of Dutch Christian Philosopher Herman Dooyeweerd.  Along with editions of In the Twilight of Modern Thought and The Christian Idea of the State, the four volume work entitled magnum opus, titled A New Critique of Theoretical Thought was a P &  R publication.  It was initially priced at a very affordable level and was later selling for less than $20 for the 4 hardback volume set.  Along with that, the same company published other books promoting and discussing Dooyeweerd’s thought (such as works by E. H. Hebden-Taylor) as well as books that were critical of Dooyeweerd and his followers.

The most surprising thing is that P & R became the main publisher for the famous “unpublished syllabi” of Cornelius Van Til, along with complete books of his thought, and works by his most famous fellow Presbyterian adversary Gordon H. Clark.

Image result for charles craig presbyterian and reformed publishing

A young Gordon Clark and a young Cornelius Van Til–both poring over books, life-long pursuits for both men.

Obviously, Mr. Craig was primarily interested in getting the ideas, debates, and discussions going among Christian students rather than taking a side and attempting to suppress one view or the other.  One would not have noticed in the P  & R catalogs that Van Til and Clark had waged a theological/philosophical battle royal.  Both authors works were published and both were devoted to many of the same topics.  Van Til wrote Christianity and Barthianism and Clark wrote Karl Barth’s Theological Method. Both men were strongly opposed to Barth’s theology and concerned about the popularity of his writings and thought among American Christian pastors and teachers.

Image result for karl barth's theological method                                          Image result for van til christianity and barthianism


 Both jousted with and did mortal combat with atheism, Darwinian naturalism, and other non-Christian philosophies.  Both were highly critical of neo-Orthodoxy, Arminianism, and Catholicism.  Their books and subjects complemented each other.

Image result for gordon clark books presbyterian and reformed

The University Series: Philosophical Studies of Presbyterian and Reformed, a.k.a. Craig Press, included several of Clark’s works.

A few of Gordon Clark’s books were published by Baker Book House and other publishers, but P & R was the main source for his books for many years.  Often the P & R titles were published under the name of Craig Press, which enabled more college teachers and non-Presbyterians to use the books.  In time–not sure of the exact time frame here–P & R changed its focus and began publishing more books designed to reach a wider audience.  The covers became more attractive, the topics were more practical, and the publication was no longer the hard-core Calvinistic scholarship center it had been from the 1950s-1980s.  This should not be taken as a criticism of P & R, nor should anyone think that P & R is not still publishing some great and weighty books.  See, for example, the works of John Frame (including his History of Western Philosophy and Theology), the books by and about Cornelius Van Til (including Greg Bahnsen’s Van Til’s Apologetic), and books on a number of social, cultural, and theological topics.

Around 1977,  a man who had embraced Gordon Clark’s theology, philosophy, and apologetics began a publishing and study center in Unicoi, Tennessee.  His name was John Robbins, and he had already made his mark in areas of Christian writing and political action.  His doctoral thesis was on Objectionist author Ayn Rand.  Still in print today under the title Ayn Rand and the Close of Her System, it is the only book I have ever come across that gives a Christian critique of Rand, who remains popular in conservative and libertarian circles.

As Robbins was working through his own thoughts and ideas, he read widely in the tradition of philosophers who were political or theological or both.  Upon reading Gordon Clark, he had his “eureka” moment and fully embraced a Clarkian view of God and man and things.  As Clark’s books were going out of print, Robbins was able to take up the Clark banner and publish or reprint the books.

Image result for a christian view of men and things


The result is that more of Gordon Clark’s books are available today than ever before.  Robbins’ publishing house is called The Trinity Foundation.  Clark’s books are available in paperback, some in hardback, and more and more in digital formats.  With the publication of the Douma biography of Clark, we should expect more Christian readers to want to read the man’s own writings.

Be warned:  Gordon Clark never felt the need to apologize for God, side-step the Bible and its authority, or give a safe, mealy-mouthed answer to any issue.  He was dogmatic, assertive, and unswerving in his convictions.  It was not meanness or rudeness that compelled him to write in such a blunt, straight-forward way.  Clark was a man of deeply held convictions who would not or could not tolerate sloppy thinking.  I admit that I would never have approached Gordon Clark unless I were armed with a friendly bowl of chocolate ice cream.  And I would never ever attempt to play chess against him.

But the time is ripe to start grabbing up, collecting, and reading Gordon Clark’s books.  He will challenge even when he doesn’t convince.  He will set a high bar for Christian thinking.  His gift was not in writing in a winsome easy style, so be sure to have strong, hot, caffeine enhanced coffee, along with a pen and paper at hand.  Be prepared for a blessing, but one that will take some amount of labor to obtain.

Postscript:  John Robbins was Clark’s bulldog.  A gracious and generous man in the classroom (according to Nathan Clark George–grandson of Gordon Clark and student of Dr. Robbins), Robbins was also generous in distributing books.  My school has used Clark’s Logic, Machen’s Education, Christianity, and the State, and Clark’s short book God and Evil: The Problem Solved, all of which were provided free of charge by the Trinity Foundation.

Also, a few years before he died, Dr. Robbins published a book of economic essays he had written.  Some of these had previously appeared in the Trinity Foundation newsletter.  In one of his essays, Robbins referred to Hilaire Belloc as an American Catholic.  I emailed Robbins and told him that Belloc was an Englishman of French ancestry.  “I don’t want anyone attacking your essay because of a mistake.”  I admitted that I wasn’t sure whether or not I agreed with the essay or not, but I didn’t want Robbins’ argument sidetracked.

When that essay–now corrected–appeared in the book, my copy of the book was autographed with the inscription saying: “Thanks for saving me from conferring American citizenship on Hilaire Belloc.”

Related image

The only picture of John Robbins I have ever seen on the internet. I wish I could have met him.


And Now For the Bad News

Image result for troubled times

Today is Good Friday and there is no better time than today to remember that we live in troubled times.  The phrase “troubled times” might even be redundant because, to tweak Dickens’ memorable phrase, even the best of times are also the worst of times.  I just finished reading Jay Winik’s fine book 1944 FDR and the Year That Changed History.  Not only was the world at war that year (and victory for the Allies was in sight), but the Holocaust was at its worst levels.  The destruction of the German military was proceeding rapidly, but so was the destruction of the Jewish people in Europe.

Image result for jay winik 1944

So, all times are troubled times.  There never was a Golden Age and the “Good Ole Days” never really happened, although many of us can wish for some of the benefits of youth.  The world is sinful and sin-filled.  Like the recurring creatures in Beowulf, the destruction of one evil always leads to the emergence of another.  The Cold War was won without a major hot war, but the world is now faced with radical Islamic forces (who threaten not just us but fellow Muslims) and Russia does want its 1980’s foreign policy back.

Some of my recent readings have had a focus on troubles, although the emphasis has been on domestic and moral issues rather than international problems.  The contributors toward the discussion have been Christians from different backgrounds and perspectives.  None have offered any easy way out.  As it happens, my Humanities class has been reading The Consolation of Philosophy by Boetheius.  Philosophy in that account is a woman who comes to give comfort to Boetheius who is in prison awaiting execution.  Her answers, although laden with much Greek philosophy, are Christian.  She doesn’t give him a file and a saw so that he can escape prison and execution, but rather a way of seeing above and beyond the immediate dire circumstances.

The Minor Prophets of the Old Testament have much to say to us in our current age.  Apart from Jonah, they don’t get much play time on Christian life patterns.  But the Minor Prophets are still part of the inspired, infallible, authoritative Word of God and they are minor only in the sense that their messages are relatively short.  Also, they speak God’s judgement and grace to sinful people in sinful cultures and conditions.

I recently completed the reading of The Message of the Twelve: Hearing the Voice of the Minor Prophets by Richard Alan Fuhr, Jr. and Gary E. Yates.  This book is published by B & H Academic, which is currently publishing quite a few outstanding works including The Lost Sermons of C. H. Spurgeon.

When I was reading The Message of the Twelve, I kept thinking that it was a good and useful book.  Then I realized that I should be reading the Minor Prophets along with the text.  That increased the usefulness of the book exponentially.  This is a work I need to pull back off the shelves each time my Old Testament readings reach those last twelve books.  It is useful for outlines, commentary, and overview.  It could be used for personal study, preaching helps, or a classroom.  And like most all good resources, it contains a good bibliography and other references to more in-depth studies of particular prophets.

To restate the main contention:  We live in times where we need to hear and apply afresh the prophetic word from the Minor Prophets.

Being that there never was a time when the Church just sailed along on untroubled seas, church history provides lots of helps for us to use.  One of the greatest works from the Middle Ages is a short, very readable little collection of guidelines for Christian living called The Rule of St. Benedict.  The pro’s (mostly historical) and con’s (mostly Biblical) of monasticism can be debated elsewhere.  Any fan of the Protestant Reformation and its Solas will find great encouragement in the Scripture-soaked message of this work.

Image result for rule of st. benedict

The message and ministry of Benedict has received quite a bit of attention lately due to a new book and an idea that has been debated over the last several years. The book is The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation by Rod Dreher.

Image result for benedict option

The key concern of this book is the cultural breakdown and impending anti-Christian cultural and legal dangers.  The Supreme Court rulings on marriage, issues relating to homosexuality, the politics of our time, and many other factors don’t bode well for Christian living.  As these forces press in on the Christian community, the need to respond is urgent.  Dreher has lots of suggestions and ideas about how the Christians can take cover and recover amidst all this.

A major criticism of the book is that it is calling for a retreat, to a degree.  P. Andrew Sandlin has a well written critique of the book titled “The Cultural Mandate, Not Benedict Option.”   Andrew’s review is just one of many–both pro, con, and mixed–of this book.  For my part, while agreeing wholeheartedly in the Cultural Mandate trumping the Benedict Option, I still appreciate Dreher’s book.  There is much to be said for his suggestions.  Building stronger Christian communities, educating our children in Christian schools, and shunning the trends and patterns of ungodly behavior are all commendable.  Take note that this book is “a strategy” and not “the strategy” for Christian action.

The Benedict Option is a worthwhile read.

For quite a while now, Albert Mohler has been on the cutting edge of cultural and theological issues.  How he has managed to preside over a major seminary and bring reformation to it while speaking and writing to a nation-wide audience is beyond me.  I finished reading his book We Cannot Be Silent today.  As the subtitle notes, this book is about “speaking truth to a culture redefining sex, marriage, and the very meaning of right and wrong.”

Image result

This past week, which is often called Holy Week, I kept thinking that this was just not the right book to be reading in the days leading up to Easter.  Certainly a book about the life or teachings or passion of Jesus Christ might have been a better choice in some respects.  But We Cannot Be Silent was also a useful read because it reminds us of the sinful world that Jesus came to save.

Without being crude or graphic, this book depicts the moral pit our nation has fallen, or rather willingly jumped into.  From politics to court rulings to movies and the ever changing rules of politically correct thought, we are in a whole new ballgame.  It was not very many years ago when liberal Democrat candidates for high office were politically sympathetic toward same-sex unions, but were still affirming that marriage was between one man and one woman.  Al Gore of Election 2000 was closer culturally with Charlemagne than Democrats and many Republicans are today.

Christians have to weigh through lots of options, forums, and actions on the radicalization of the sexual revolution.  And the Christian community has need of intense repentance and reform within our own ranks.  This is not a feel-good book.  It is a prophetic call to wake up.

Image result for n t wright the revolution

And since it is Good Friday, I started reading N. T. Wright’s new book The Day the Revolution Began: Reconsidering the Meaning of Jesus’s Crucifixion.  Not only was the opening chapter quite good and edifying, it was helpful for me to realize that this day in history marks the day the world changed.  The problems are still piled up higher than we can fathom, but sin has been dealt with.

Best Histories of 2016


Image result for william styron a great book should leave you

April has arrived and I have failed to create a list of the 10 Ten Books of the past year (2016).  This has always been a big event in my otherwise sedentary life.  This causes me to have to get up, walk to the shelves, look up and down the rows, and remember what I have read.  Sometimes I even have to pace the floor thinking through which books were best.

I used to number the list 1 to 10.  Then authors began craving the higher ratings and jealousies ensued when someone was beat out of 3rd place by Tolstoy or some other contender.  Also, I never was sure why one book was number 5 while another was number 9.  I just know that I really enjoyed them.

In this post, I will highlight some of the really good, even best, history readings from the past year.  I will try to follow up with other categories, including theology, classics, and popular fiction.


How the West Was Won: The Neglected Story of the Triumph of Modernity by Rodney Stark

Image result

It is with no little bit of professional jealousy that I admit that Rodney Stark is one of the best cultural historians around today.  Dr. Stark is an academic in both training and profession, but his field of specialization is sociology.  Yet his histories–with lots of focus on Christianity and religious beliefs–each keep knocking the ratings in terms of accomplishment.  Maybe it is exercising judgment out of the normal bounds that enables him to speak with such authority and write with such boldness.  The only other historian I rank alongside Rodney Stark is the Englishman Paul Johnson.

This particular book, which is one of more than a half dozen Stark titles, resets and recasts the typical assumptions regarding Western Civilization.  This book is a clarion call against the tenets of modernity, post-modernity, political correctness, post-Enlightenment education, and Christian squeamishness.  The book is chocked full of bibliographical selections just in case one is thinking that Stark is creating his own reality.

The War of the World by Niall Ferguson.

Image result

War of the World:  Twentieth-Century Conflict and the Descent of the West needs to be viewed and read in the context of other fine histories by Scotsman Niall Ferguson.  His books are weighty and often focused on economic aspects of history.  By training and inclination, Ferguson is an economic historian.  But unlike the trends of economic historians of the past century, he is totally free from Marxist interpretations of economics or human nature.

If someone wants to read of the epic battles and brave soldiers of the two world wars, avoid this book.  Look instead to the works of John Keegan, Max Hastings, and Rick Atkinson.  But if one wishes to read of the greater political, social, cultural, and economic forces that plunged the western world into a really long destructive 20th century war–lasting from 1914 to 1945 with a rest break in between–read this book.

Ferguson’s other outstanding histories include Civilization: The West and the Rest, The Ascent of Money, and Empire.

Honorable Mention

To Hell and Back by Ian Kershaw

Related image

To Hell and Back: Europe 1914-1949 by Ian Kershaw (who was written a multi-volume biography of Hitler) is a part of the Penguin History of Europe.  The whole series is quite good and includes works by some skilled historians.  Kershaw’s book covers lots of the same territory as Ferguson’s book, but he includes quite a bit of information about the often ignored areas of eastern Europe.  Sometimes, we are prone to think of the world wars as involving only the half dozen bigger powers.  The coverage of other areas reminded me of how little I know of European history.


The Crisis in Evangelical Christianity by Keith Sewell


I became acquainted with Dr. Keith Sewell several years ago through a web-site focusing on Christian philosophy.  I kept up with him after he retired from teaching history at Dordt College in Iowa and moved to Australia.  Since then I have read articles he has written on historical issues and have read from his work on historian Herbert Butterfield.  It can be a bit awkward when you read and then are expected to review a book by a friend (even one who is a friend only via e-mail, hence an e-friend).  I was not just relieved, but quite excited when I read this book.

This study is a good survey of the strengths and weaknesses of Evangelical Christianity.  Dr. Sewell writes as one who has not only lived in various countries in the English-speaking world, but who has been open toward various Christian experiences.  He is, like me, basically Reformed in background and theology.  There are more than a few high water marks and accomplishments for evangelicalism.  But there are failures and weaknesses as well.  In short, this book surveys the history.  It is outstanding as an overview, a refresher course, and a starting point for evaluating where we Christians have been and where we ought to go.

The Church: A Theological and Historical Account by Gerald Bray

Image result for gerald BRAY THE CHURCH

I read The Church: A Theological and Historical Account by Gerald Bray soon after finishing Sewell’s book.  Although there is some overlap, the two works complement each other quite well.  Bray covers a wider expanse of time.  He begins with the church in the Bible and then traces the various eras through history.  But this book is not just another church history survey.  The strength is his theological analysis of the role and function of the church.

This book sold me on itself and the author.


Theology of the Reformers by Timothy George June

Image result

This being 2017, there are already many books coming out that are celebrating and analyzing the lives and theology of the Protestant Reformation.  (In case you forgot, Martin Luther nailed the 95 Theses to the church door in October of 1517, so this year is the 500th anniversary of that event.)  Along with the new books, we cannot neglect the outstanding scholarship and thrilling accounts of the Reformers that were written earlier.

Theology of the Reformers by Timothy George came out over 25 years ago.  How did I miss it through all the years?  I have read and collected books on the Reformation since 1974.  In my small pond, I think of myself as somewhat well informed on that time period.  This book, however, opened my eyes wider than they have been opened before.  Most of the account is predictable in terms of major subjects:  Luther, Calvin, Melancthon, Knox, the English Reformation, and the Anabaptists.  The biographical stories are included, but the main strength is the analysis of the theologies of the different arms of the Reformation.


George Whitefield : America’s Spiritual Founding Father by Thomas S. Kidd February-March

Image result for thomas kidd george whitefield

Thomas Kidd is a rising force in Christian history.  In spite of his relative youthfulness (and having the last name of Kidd), he is no novice.  A professor of history at Baylor Univesity, Kidd is pumping out a wide range of books on topics relating to Christian history, most of which are centered on American history.  Even this biography, titled George Whitefield–America’s Spiritual Founding Father, while covering the life of an English preacher is largely focused on Whitefield’s many experiences in the American colonies.

Arnold Dallimore’s older two volume biography is more inspiring.  In the Banner of Truth tradition, it aims to both educate and inspire.  This book is much more scholarly and analytical.  But don’t think that this is simply head-knowledge with no heart.  Good history can teach while instructing in righteousness.  Sometimes that instruction is from the positive example of a tireless evangelist like Whitefield, and sometimes it is from the negative instruction from his own failures.

I am slowly collecting all of Dr. Kidd’s books.  He is a historian to watch and read.


A Peace to End All Peace by David Fromkin

Related image

This book–A Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East–was an unusual find.  I picked it up used for a dollar.  I really questioned myself for staring to read it due to its length–570 pages.  While reading it, I found myself continually confused and sometimes lost because the names of Middle Eastern, particularly Turkish, leaders are unfamiliar.  Some events, like World War I, were familiar, but much of the information was new to me.

But all along the way, I kept realizing how informative, well written this book is.  It is not a one-time read for me.  Even I did not realize how much I did not know about how the modern Middle Eastern countries were formed.  Finishing this book left me strongly desiring to know more, to read more about this same area of history, and to read this very book again.

David Fromkin is a good author.  Some years ago, I really enjoyed his book Europe’s Last Summer: Who Started the Great War in 1914?  He is moving up in the ranks of favored historians on my list.


Christian Historiography: Five Views by Jay D. Green

Image result for green christian historiography

Christian Historiography: Five Rival Versions by Jay D. Green made me want to go back to the starting blocks in the study of history.  This is one of the best books I have ever read on what history itself is and how it should be studied by Christians.  On the one hand, it includes lots of references and works by some of the best Christian historians, such as Kenneth Scott Latourette, George Marsden, Lewis Spitz, and others.  Then it analyzes different approaches to history as exemplified by both scholars and popularizers.

I confess to having read, enjoyed, and followed, and even imitated many popularizers who have used history to support our beliefs and enlivened our stories.  There is a place for the slightly exaggerated anecdotal accounts of history, but those who are serious about the profession have to learn the ropes and think more carefully.  Such professionalism, to use an awful sounding term, does not have to ruin history.  In other words, to make George Washington into a theologian is bad history.  To reveal him as a man of great leadership skills and heroic stature and even a man of faith can be done both correctly and in a way that edifies.

Don’t plan on majoring in history or teaching history without having read this book with care.



Thomas Fleming is one of my favorite writers and historians.  I have also come to know him as a very gracious gentleman.  I don’t have to wonder if a book he has written will be good or not–it will be.  While he is conversant on quite a few areas of history, the early period from the American Revolution to the Jeffersonian Era is his specialty.  I am anticipating with eagerness his next book which will be on the generalship of George Washington.

This past year was unnforgettable and, quite frankly, odd as a political season.  Sometimes, in search of sanity, I found it healing to read political histories.  As the Roman historian Livy said, “The study of history is the best medicine for a sick mind.”  Part of the cure is being able to see that there never was a pristine, perfect past where only statesmen walked the halls of power.  George Washington, John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and Thomas Jefferson were all gifted men and brilliant leaders in their time.

But they were men, meaning human, meaning like us, meaning great virtues and damaging vices can exist side by side.  The Great Divide: The Conflict Between Washington and Jeffeson That Defined A Nation tells the story of Jefferson’s frequent scheming, undermining, and opposing George Washington.  Sure, Jefferson served Washington as Secretary of State, and Jefferson had plenty of defining moments as a man of vision. But after you finish gazing at Jefferson’s monuments across the land, you can be sure that no one would wisely turn his back on the man from Monticello.

Much of the conflict was carried on at a ground level by Hamilton and Jefferson and some of their supporters, but it was a real divide.  If you are not thankful for anything else today, be thankful for this:  Jefferson’s unabated love for the French Revolution did not infect George Washington.  Great book.  Read Thomas Fleming, starting with any book he wrote.

Image result for when america liked ike

When America Liked Ike: How Moderates Won the 1952 Election and Reshaped American Politics by Gary Donaldson will probably only appeal to political science students and teachers and political junkies like me.  This retelling of the story of the 1952 election was a refreshing read during a year when the bizarre in politics became mainstream.  Neither Eisenhower or Stevenson were perfect men, but had Stevenson won, America would have been well governed.  And since Eisenhower won, it was, likewise, well governed.

It is surprising that after four national defeats–several of them by landslide proportions–that the Republicans would have all flocked to General Eisenhower.  But the party establishment (that bad word of 2016) included plenty of conservative (when it included isolationism as a plank) forces.  National elections hinge on lots of demographic and economic dynamics.  The personalities at the top of the tickets only reflect and motivate those forces.  Good book.  First time I have read this author, but it won’t be the last.


The Death of Humanity and the Case for Life and Hitler’s Religion: The Twisted Beliefs that Drove the Third Reich by Richard Weikart

Image result for richard weikart books

Image result for richard weikart books

I am both proud of and jealous of my e-friend Dr. Richard Weikart for getting two outstanding books published in one year.  The two books are on largely different subjects, although Dr. Weikart has focused quite a bit of his career on the ideas and philosophies that influenced the modern German and the Third Reich.

I have previously reviewed both of these books and would again recommend them as serious, weighty, and good reads.  The Death of Humanity, as I have said before, can be viewed as an undated, retelling of the message of Francis Schaeffer in How Should We Then Live?  There are always those who object to such books in part because they boil the thinking of a major figure down to a few pages.  I am more than happy for someone to counter these books with lengthy analyses of several hundred pages on such thinkers.  Certainly, men like Darwin, Huxley, Nietzsche, and others are worthy candidates for in-depth studies.  But until the 24 hour day is abolished, I am dependent on those who synthesize and condense philosophers, scientists, and social commentators.

The Death of Humanity, like all of Weikart’s books, is premised on Christian presuppositions.  But all serious students of LIFE should read his books.  His underlying belief system is not concealed, but it is, in my opinion, convincing.

Hitler’s Religion is a serious and detailed book that clearly shows how unclear Hitler’s religious views were. He was not a Christian in any sense of the word and not even likely a theist in any real sense.  That point has to be asserted and proved since there are those who attack Christianity on the grounds that men like Hitler and Stalin were Christians.  I am more than open and optimistic about questions regarding the faith of men like Churchill and Roosevelt, but think that contending Hitler’s Christianity is a minor point.

But that then raises the question of what Hitler was.  It would not be a fair point or accurate one for a Christian to pin the label of atheist on Hitler either.  On the one hand, Hitler gave lots of public statements that were religiously based.  He was a skilled politician who knew how to use words so as to please several crowds at once.  He did live and rule in a country that had Christian roots and institutions.  But Hitler himself was a pantheist.  As Gary Scott Smith said, “Weikart argues that Hitler is best understood as a pantheist, one who believes that nature is God and that the cosmos provides principles to guide human conduct.”

This book is not just a good read about the particular mixed up mind of Adolf Hitler. Instead, it tells us quite a bit about the basically religious nature of all men and of some of the particular deviations found in early 20th Century Europe.


The Fatal Land: War, Empire, and the Highland Soldier in British America by Matthew Dziennik


I must admit to a lot of prejudice regarding the author here.  I met Dr. Dziennik a few years ago at Yorktown Battlefield.  He was still working on his doctorate and traipsing back and forth from his native Scotland to the U.S. and Canada doing research and lecturing and working on his dissertation.  He is what I would have been if I had been young, disciplined, brave enough to travel, and smart–and Scottish.  I knew from our conversation and subsequent communications that this guy was an up-and-coming name in the field of history.  This book is proof that I was right.

Reader beware, however:  This is a serious, scholarly, and sometimes technical study of Scottish Highlander soldiers in the British possessions in North America.  If you simply want to enjoy the imaginary thrill of bagpipes as hearty Scots dash across the field of battle to give cold steel to their enemies, this book might disappoint you. But if you want to both read some serious history and actually see what historians have to do, read this book.

Scotsmen were not all basic warriors at heart.  They lived in a land subjugated by their English neighbors (overlords).  Lack of opportunities made military service an interesting option.  Military service generally meant transfer to the North American colonies.  So Scotsmen served throughout the 13 colonies and the Canadian territories.  The various wars and conflicts with Frenchmen, Indians, and disgruntled American colonists gave them plenty of opportunities to fight.  Time spent in the colonies also convinced some to find their own stakes in the land here.

Part of the value of this book is that it punctures one of my favorite images.  It is not that I am wrong and Dr. Dziennik is right (or at least I am not admitting that).  It is that the story I like to believe is only a part of the story.  Surely, lots of Scotsmen who migrated to the colonies served under General Washington.  Surely, the battles of Cowpens and King’s Mountain were payback for defeats at places like Culloden.  But lots of Scots gave total service and loyalty to the British army.  As Professor Tom Wagy asserts and re-asserts, “Nothing is simple.”

This book comes with a pretty good price.  Then comes the price of the time and attention needed to read it.  But, it’s worth it.  I am looking forward to many more books from Matthew Dziennik.



Spurgeon–Round 2

It turns out that the correct quote is as follows:  “Sell all that you have (not least of all some of your stock of current sermonic literature) and buy Spurgeon (even if you have to grub through the second-hand bookstores).  The statement was made by German pastor Helmut Thielicke in the book Encounter With Spurgeon.  It was in the midst of grubbing around through some second-hand books years ago that I picked up a cheap and decent copy of Thielicke’s book.  Most of his book consists of selected Spurgeon pieces from Lectures to My Students.  For that reason, I shelved the book–which cost about 50 cents–and neglected until yesterday.

Thielicke’s 45 page introduction or case for reading Spurgeon is an excellent exhortation and coverage of the man and his influence.  But, anyone who writes about Spurgeon faces the inevitable challenge:  How can you say enough about the man?  This is not hagiography or creating a mythical near-perfect man.  He had his faults and limitations, but he was incredibly balanced in his ministry and life.  And productive.  His writings total more than the Encyclopedia Brittanica.  His church was a mega-church and a number of ministries sprung from it.  Spurgeon’s sermons and writings were best sellers in his day, and his books still sell today.

The phrase from Hebrews–“though being dead, he still speaks”–is often used of Spurgeon.  It is not as though his readers then stand in pulpits and present Spurgeon like sermons.  (Nor would we read Shakespeare in order to pattern our every day conversation after him.)  The main challenge of a preacher is not finding words to say.  If you cannot speak and are not loquacious, you probably are not destined for the pulpit.  (Although we have all longed for certain sermons to end more quickly.)

The main challenge of a preacher is listening.  The preacher’s mind is gathering bullet points for the sermon, picking up exegetical details on the text, absorbing and improving upon the commentaries, fashioning the order of the sermon, finding the perfect beginning and ending, and thinking through who will be sitting in the congregation and how the sermon will or should impact them.  Think, think, think, read, read, read.  That’s all part of the life of ministry.  But the preacher–far more than the lowliest congregant–needs to be preached to.  He needs to hear.

Of course, preachers need to listen to God from His Word.  But God always blesses faithful proclaimation of His Word.  And God uses means–often men–to bring His message to us.  The preacher, hopefully unlike the doctor, is sicker than the congregation.  He has time to know more, focus more, and be discipled more, but the minister’s responsiveness is dull.  Simply put, having read what I have read for the past 40 plus years, I ought to be spiritually pure and righteous and perfect in the sight of God and man. (Remember James 3:1– Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness.)

This again recalls the importance of having Spurgeon’s works, reading Spurgeon, and selling other goods in order to buy Spurgeon.  There are 3 (and who knows how many more) examples I might appeal to.  These 3 men have all been pastor/examples/mentors to me along the way.  First, Henry Wood who introduced me to Calvinism and Spurgeon, Warfield, Gordon Clark, Loraine Boettner, Gregg Singer, R. J. Rushdoony, and so much more.  Prominent on his bookshelves was his set of Spurgeon’s Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit.  

Mr. Wood encountered Calvinism while a student at Ouachita Baptist College.  Somewhere along the way, someone gave the modified version of the Thielicke quote as advice to him, saying “Sell your shoes and buy Spurgeon.”

Then there is the respected and revered Pastor Mickey Schneider, who now lives in Florida.  I first heard Pastor Schneider in the summer of 1980 while I was taking a couple of courses at Reformed Theological Seminary in Jackson, Mississippi.  Mickey was pastoring a Presbyterian church in Jackson and was preaching through his favorite book, Ecclesiastes.  His sermon was on Christian education, and I was already committed to that, but was further confirmed in that conviction.

It would be many years before mine and Mickey’s paths began crossing again.  He has been here in Texarkana on several occasions to preach (and visit his daughter).  He is Mr. Southern Presbyterianism, in my view.  He has met every one, known them, shared vital experiences with them, and either stood alongside them or opposed them along the way.  Who else watched Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech with Cornelius Van Til (who was in a bathing suit about to go swimming)?  Who else wandered around lost in Jackson, MS with R. J. Rushdoony as his passenger?

Here is Mickey Schneider’s comment about Spurgeon’s works:  I purchased the 63 volumes of The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit gradually over the years, and they are still on the top shelf of my office across one whole wall, next to my bust of Charles H. Spurgeon and the textual and topical index. I still refer to regularly, though many in our circles would disdain him. You don’t go to Spurgeon for exegesis – sometimes he is terrible! But you go to him for life and power and illustration and application. When I go over a sermon beforehand with Judy, she might say, “You’d better get something from Spurgeon on this one!”

Image may contain: 2 people, people smiling

Mickey (sometimes Michael and, at least once, Arthur) Schneider alongside his wise ministerial counselor and wife, Judy.

And then there is George Grant, prolific author, pastor, conference speaker, and one of the most sought after lecturers of our time.  George commented on my previous Spurgeon blog saying, “This is a great survey of where to start with Spurgeon–but, everyone should be forewarned: if you start Spurgeon you will spend the rest of your life reading him! And, you’ll never exhaust the supply of fresh, rich wisdom.”

George also listed Spurgeon as being among the authors now deceased who he is determined to read in their entirety.  It would be tricky to find a book by or about Spurgeon that Grant has not long since read.  His shared–was it to make me covetous?–a picture of his set of Spurgeon’s sermons–“strategically located across from my desk.”

No automatic alt text available.

This is all background to my having started on reading The Lost Sermons of C. H. Spurgeon, edited by Christian T. George and published by B&H Academic.  This first volume costs a bit, but it is worth the money.  First of all, it is a beautiful volume–both inside and outside.  (Please don’t let me know if you acquire a kindle version of this.  That would be like having a kindle version of a great work of art.)  There is something, no a lot, to be said for owning really nice hardback, beautiful editions of books.

Second, the foreword by David Bebbington, the editor’s preface by Dr. Christian George, the timeline (a really fascinating survey of the 19th century), and the biographical information are all outstanding.  Did you know that Mark Twain went to hear Spurgeon preach?  (I keep holding out hope that Mr. Clemons was converted by the end of his life, but the evidences are few and far between.)

This Lost Sermons series–and we only have volume 1 available at the moment–will increase the amount of Spurgeon materials by 10%.  Astounding, especially considering how relatively short Spurgeon’s life was.

My recent Spurgeon quest has already had yet another benefit.  I have gotten re-acquianted with Pilgrim Publications in Pasadena, Texas. Started by Bob Ross, who is still active in this book ministry, Pilgrim has been re-printing and publishing Spurgeon’s works for decades.  In fact, the Metropolitan Tablenacle Pulpit–as pictured above and below–is one of the major productions of this organization.  They also publish The Treasury of David in seven volumes, rather than the 3 volumes that Baker publishes.  What is the difference?  Mary Barber of Pilgrim explained it.  She writes, “The one from Pilgrim is unabridged, unedited, word for word in both typeset and design, reflecting the original Passmore and Alabaster editions first published by Spurgeon.”  Oh my, even the Spurgeon books I do have aren’t enough!


Pilgrim also publishes the rich New Park Street Pulpit, which consists of sermons from an early (but not the earliest) stage of Spurgeon’s preaching.  These sermons are often the most quoted in conjunction with Spurgeon’s Calvinistic convictions.

The conclusion of the matter is simple:  I must have the Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit.  The one volume I own is not enough.  Until then, I am going to continue reading and enjoying Thielicke’s Encounter With Spurgeon and The Lost Sermons of C. H. Spurgeon.

Also, I have some items for sale.  Any one interested?

Image result for thielicke encounter with spurgeon



Gordon Clark: Presbyterian Philosopher

I first became aware of Gordon Clark somewhere around 1975-76.  He was approaching his last decade, but was still actively writing, while I was just newly introduced to the vast realm of Reformed theology and thought.  There were, for many of us newly minted Calvinists of that time, two primary pillars that were both the attraction and battering rams in Reformed life.

One was soteriology, and remember that we like big words like that.  Soteriology is the doctrine of salvation, and for Calvinists, this began with grasping the Five Points of Calvinism.  The quick track to the 5 Points was found found in a book consisting mostly of Bible texts, titled The Five Points of Calvinism:  Defined, Documented, and Defended by David Steele and Curtis C. Thomas.  But that short book was originally an appendix to Steele and Thomas’ key work titled Romans:  An Interpretive Outline.  Both books were published by Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.

Image result for steele and thomas five points            Related image

The man who wrote the introduction for the Romans book and who urged Charles Craig of Presbyterian and Reformed to publish it was Gordon Clark.

At that same point in time, Presbyterian and Reformed mailed out a newsletter every month.  At the bottom of the newsletter was a list of books that were on sale, often for a dollar. One of the book I got was Karl Barth’s Theological Method by Gordon Clark–a hardback edition for a buck! I also got Clark’s book Biblical Predestination.  

Image result for gordon clark karl barth's theological methodImage result for gordon clark predestination

The book on Barth was out of my league, but I was reading everything I could find on predestination.

Over the years, I continued to buy books by Gordon Clark here and there.  I never sytematically or rigously read his books, but through the years I read one here and there.  Favorites included Historiography: Secular and Religious (reviewed here), The Christian Philosophy of Education, A Christian View of Men and Things, and his commentary on 1 Corinthians.

Also, I have read and re-read and have had a love/hate relationship with Clark’s book Logic.  Here is what I wrote about it back in 2006:

Right now, we are studying Gordon Clark’s book Logic in both classes. For Logic class, the book is an introduction, albeit a “push you off into the deep end of the pool” approach…. Clark was a brilliant man, a key Christian philospher, and according to many student testimonies, a great teacher. He was not necessarily a great writer or communicator of logic skills. His book rambles; he makes statements without support; he raises questions he does not answer; he slips wit in where more details are needed; and he strays off here and there. The book gives me the sense of sitting in the presence of a brilliant man whose years of study, reading, and writing are being displayed for all to delight in. I love the book, and I rejoice that I do not have to use it as my primary logic text. It is a great supplement, a useful introduction, a helpful refresher.

Image result for gordon clark logic

And then there was that weird, jam-packed used book store in Hot Springs, back around the year 2004.  You could not move around in the store and there were stacks and boxes of books everywhere.  But this was a nightmare place, not a delightful hunting ground.  Most–as in 90%–of the books were trade paperback romances and other forms of pulp fiction.  But I am a hunter.  Somewhere in a stack of books almost too high to reach was a book that caught my eye:  The Philosophy of Gordon H. Clark: A Restschrift, edited by Ronald Nash.  It was a hardback book and was priced for $5.00.  (I later–to my regret–missed a chance to buy an autographed copy of the same work.)

Image result for nash the philosophy of gordon h. clark

My copy is hardback with a dust jacket. The book has been reprinted as Gordon Clark and His Critics.

The big awakening came somewhere around 2005 or 2006.  A friend, Jeff Bruce, sent me a link to an article titled “The Closing of the Calvinistic Mind” by James Jordan.  The article completely blew me away.  But it wasn’t because it told me something new, but rather it reminded me of something from my past, as well as that of Jordan and many others.  It was like discovering some vital links in your family tree.  Yes, here were the Calvinist writers who had impacted and dominated my early years.

Jordan’s article was soon followed by a similar type article by P. Andrew Sandlin, titled “The De-Intellectualization of Reformed Theology.” (Why is this not available on the internet somewhere?)  My own contribution to the topic shows up here in a blog post titled “Reformed Thinkers.”  Then I had the opportunity to give some talks in both Virginia at the Christian Worldview Student Conference and in Alaska at a Reformation conference.  My Virginia lectures were called “Calvinistic Worldview Thinkers in the Wilderness Years” and my Alaska talks were called “Spheres of Reformation.”

Clark was back on the radar, but I realize now that I did not then nor have given him the wide berth he deserves as a pioneering Calvinist philosopher, worldview thinker, theologian, and model of scholarship.  Douglas Douma’s newly published biography–Gordon Clark:  The Presbyterian Philosopher–will be step one in remedying a widespect neglect of Gordon Clark’s life, thought, and books.

A few brief points on this book:

  1.  Notice the second part of the title:  The Presbyterian Philosopher.  The good news is that Christians–Reformed, Catholic, and otherwise–have carved out a wide swath in the field of philosophy in our day.  As is always the case with academic fields, philosophers–even those sharing Reformed credentials–fall into different schools of thought.  Many are Dooyeweerdians, meaning that they subscribe to or borrow from or build upon the work of Dutch philosopher Herman Dooyeweerd.  Many ascribe the expansion of Christian philosophical thought to Arthur Holmes who built the philosophy program at Wheaton College.  The contributions of Charles Taylor, Catholic philosopher and author of The Secular Age,  cannot be ignored.  Time does not permit us to give the praises due to Nicholas Wolterstorf and Alvin Plantiga.                But Gordon Clark is often ignored, overlooked, or dismissed (and disliked?).  Long before Holmes developed the philosophy department at Wheaton, Clark was there influencing young scholars who made their own contributions in the field of Christian thinking.  While Dooyeweerd’s work was still untranslated, Clark was writing on philosophy.  While even card-carrying Calvinists sometimes flinch from the difficult doctrines of Scripture, Clark was using the Bible as a hammer–along with a strong does of Aristotelian logic–to pound philosophies secular and religious that he thought fell short of Biblical truths.

Image result for christian philosophers

  1. Worldview thinking has become popular in Christian circles.  There are many books on developing a Christian worldview, and I have and love quite a few of them.  But Gordon Clark did not write about “developing a Christian worldview.”  He demonstrated one.  Consider the fact that he wrote about philosophy, theology, politics, education, pyschology, science, historiography, and other subjects.
  2. Clark is often remembered today for the many theological controversies he was embroiled in.  Beginning with the defining battles in the day with J. Gresham Machen and the liberals of the Presbyterian Church in the north, the twentieth century was the era of “Machen’s Warrior Children,” to use John Frame’s phrase.  A great battle within the Orthodox Presbyterian Church was the debate over “The Incomprehensibility of God.”  It pitted two giants against each other–Gordon Clark and Cornelius Van Til.  Douma’s biography aptly covers this conflict, which is often referred to as the “Clark-Van Til Controversy,” but could be called “The Incomprehensibility of Gordon Clark and Cornelius Van Til” controversy.   We can take sides, eschew both sides, wring our hands, vilify either combatant–or more properly, those who continued the combat, or just shrug our shoulders over the whole mess.  But it happened and it impacted–and likely reduced–the influence of Calvinistic thought and Presbyterian church life in America.  The failure of Presbyterians to build more inroads and expansion within Fundamentalist churches have left us with small, very orthodox Reformed congregations.  Leave it to a Calvinist like John Piper to market the message to a wide audience.
Image result for clark and van til

The two primary combatants–Gordon Clark (left) and Cornelius Van Til (right).

3.  Gordon Clark’s name and fame may not be in big lights right now.  And I suspect that Gordon Clark: The Presbyterian Philosopher will not be a “New York Times Best Seller.”  But this is an excellent book and will be a catalyst for many to read Clark again (like me) and others to discover him (as Douma himself did while reading John Robbins’ book on Ayn Rand).  When asked which theologian from our times will be read in 500 years, R. C. Sproul answered, “Gordon Clark.”  Well, I reckon that Dr. Clark, Dr. Sproul, Douglas Douma, and I can judge that comment more accurately in that other realm and not having that long to wait, read Clark now.

But begin with this biography.

Image result for clark and van til

Although they sparred over theological and philosophical points, both Clark and Van Til respected and esteemed one another. As Van Til often affirmed to friends, “Soon we shall sit at Jesus’ feet.” Before that day arrived, they were reconciled.

By the way, I must admit to not liking the author Douglas Douma.  I am not well acquainted with him, but I have this against him:  1.  He is too young to have written such an outstanding book.  2.  He is too smart, since he has degrees in mechanical engineering, business, and theology. 3. And he is athletic and outdoorish.  All three traits have me miffed.

Image may contain: 1 person, smiling

Should a serious author really be standing at Horn Peak (13,450 feet) like this?

Russell Kirk: American Conservative

Image result for russell kirk man and books

“If a conservative order is indeed to return, we ought to know the tradition which is attached to it, so that we may rebuild society; if it is not to be restored, still we ought to understand conservative ideas so that we may rake from the ashes what scorched fragments of civilization escape the conflagration of unchecked will and appetite.” —Russell Kirk, The Conservative Mind

How should we say it?  Russell Kirk was ahead of his times?  Or Russell Kirk was behind his times?  Or Russell Kirk was out of step with his times?  Or Russell Kirk was beyond his times?  Or Russell Kirk is a man of all times?

Maybe Russell Kirk is largely forgotten.  I never know because people that live in my mind and thoughts are usually don’t exist for most people. That is not said to sound smug.  But, seriously, who all are seriously concerned about the ideas of Russell Kirk, William F. Buckley, J. Gresham Machen, Christopher Dawson, Gordon Clark, Cleanth Brooks, and Richard Weaver?  Most of those men’s lives correspond with mine, although in most cases they died before I had ever heard of them.

Pick an earlier century and the names become even less well known and more obscure.  Let’s begin by placing the blame on abundance.  There is simply too much to learn and too many people from the past to know.  In my Ancient World Humanities class, I always feel that we can get a good amount of at least representative examples.  Students can read Hesiod, Homer, parts of Herodotus, The Republic by Plato, Rhetoric by Aristotle, a few Greek tragedies, along with a few Romans like Virgil, Ovid, and Cicero.  Then if they work on Caesar’s Gallic Wars, a high school student has a good jump on the extant writings of the ancient world.

But the river reaches flood stage during the subsequent early church era.  There are excellent choices for the Middle Ages, and one can gain some traction with a reading of as few as ten books.  Of course, any list of ten books is excluding 10 more that equal or excell them.

“Flood stage” doesn’t begin to provide an apt metaphor for the modern period of history (meaning from the Protestant Reformation to the present).  The works growing out of the American experience once again become overwhelming, as witnessed by the Library of America publications.

Image result for library of america

So, how are we expected to remember even the most basic things about most people and books?  My official answer–based on over 45 years of working on these matters–is this:  I don’t know.  In the meantime, those who love learning, books, ideas, the past, people, and how all those things mix and mesh will keep reading and learning.

All of this mental wandering about books might just sound like the ever day musings of those people (of whom I have heard) whose lives are measured out with bookshelves (sorry, Tom).  But books, ideas, and thinkers of the past are not just the province of bookish teachers, writers, and bibliophiles (which has a slightly evil sound to it).

Instead, what really matters is finding a way of preserving the best from the past.  As a philosophy, that is often called Conservatism.  By the way, political conservatism is only one aspect of the broader concept.  Conservatism is in deep trouble today, in part because Conservatism is always in deep trouble.  There is always a pressure for change and the world is always in flux.  You cannot step in the same river twice and you cannot vote in the same election twice.  (Okay, the last part of that sentence is not exactly true.)

For a decade or two now, we have been hearing and hearing about conservative talk radio.  It is good that the older media monopoly has been broken and that a host of other outlets are available.  To paraphase Andy Warhol, in the future everyone will be a political commentator for 15 minutes.  But some are political commentators for 2 to 3 hours–daily.  And they proclaim themselves conservatives, and they wage relentless attacks on liberals, big guv’mint, the welfare state, and various opponents in the culture war.

2016 revealed lots of things about Americans, both good and bad.  (Don’t worry if it takes a while to think up the good things.)  One thing that is certain is that conservative talk radio and many who call themselves conservatives really are not conservatives at all.  They are more nationalists, protectionists, isolationists, and opponents of everything they lump together as the Washington establishment.

That is not to say that I disagree with the main body of folk and spokespeople who rally under the name of conservatism and who invoke Ronald Reagan’s name often.  Nor am I living in denial or absolute angst over the election and now early adminstration of President Trump.  But Conservatism is in trouble and largely because we don’t know what Conservatism is nor what we should be trying to conserve.

Hence the urgency of Russell Kirk.  Hence the importance of Bradley Birzer’s biography of Russell Kirk.  Hence the necessity of plodding through some of the many books written by Kirk and his intellectual colleagues and fellow travelers.

Image result for russell kirk man and books

I started reading Russell Kirk: American Conservative, published by the University of Kentucky Press, on November 3, 2016–the night that the Chicago Cubs won the world series.  (I only paid attention to the final score of that game.)  I finished the book early in March 2017.  During December, there was a long gap where I was not reading the book, due to the final illness and death of my father and then the flurry of Christmas celebrations.

At some point–in either January or February–I was flustered at my incredibly slow pace of working through the 500 plus pages of text in the book.  This was a review book that I am duty bound to read and comment on.  The author, Bradley Birzer, is one I had already formed a high opinion of because of his biographies of J. R. R. Tolkien and Christopher Dawson. I began with extremely high interest, but found myself slowly working through the book.  Part of the slow pace was due to my reading the book late at night, propped up in bed, after a strenous day of teaching school, and near the time when sleepiness overwhelms love of reading.

Then–maybe after reaching page 400–I realized something.  This is not a book to hurry through.  This is not a page-turner, a who-done-it, an escape reading, and I like all those types of books.  Instead, this book is a primer on Conservatism through the lens of a key Conservative thinker. This is a book filled with homework assignments, with lessons to be completed.  This book is Conservatism 101; no, more a graduate level 501 course.  The reader is expected to master the lectures–the book–and then begin his/her journey through the assigned/suggested/formative works mentioned throughout this book.

Image result for russell kirk man and books

One could write a very short biography of Russell Kirk.  This short:  “Russell Kirk was born in 1918.  He read lots of books and thought deeply and then wrote lots of books.  He died in 1994.  He was a major figure in the Conservative movement.”  Mr. Kirk was–by most standards, but not mine–a very dull, ordinary-looking, overly bookish fellow.  How does a life parked at the typewriter merit 500 pages?

Well, first of all, Kirk was a scholar, writer, thinker, but he was far from being simply desk-bound.  He traveled, entertained a host of friends, sparred intellectually with friends and foes, participated in political battles, enjoyed ghost stories, and fathered four daughters after a marriage late in life.

But the book is mainly the odyssey through Conservative thought of the past as remolded and fitted to the American experience.  Hence the reading assignments that are necessities after this book.  Edmund Burke is high on the list.  Kirk wrote a biography of Burke, but one absolutely must go to the source.

Image result for russell kirk man and books burke

Kirk was also deeply devoted to the writings of Christopher Dawson (whose praises I have often sung), T. S. Eliot (both his poems and essays), Albert J. Nock (older libertarian), Irving Babbit, the Southern Agrarians, and key Greek and Roman thinkers.  As Kirk slowly moved from being Christian-and Catholic-oriented to actually joining the Catholic Church, Christian doctrines and theology also impacted his thinking.  His intellectual life is itself a course in intellectual history–from a conservative angle.

Add to that his friends and colleagues.  Kirk was a peer with and a complement to William F. Buckley, Jr.  They were contrasts in many ways, but they worked together for years with Kirk being a major contributor to National Review, founded by Buckley and still the flagship of serious conservative thought.

Kirk’s range of friends also included Flannery O’Connor (Southern author of incredible fiction), Ray Bradbury (with whom Kirk shared a love of writing fiction, particularly ghost stories), T. S. Eliot (of whose thought Kirk wrote a book), Wilhelm Ropke (Christian and economist), Donald Davidson (one of the Agrarians), and Sen. Barry Goldwater, whose campaign for the Presidency represented a high point for Conservatism.

He had intellectual enemies and sparring partners as well.  Some of these bouts were “iron sharpening iron,” but some were quite hostile.  Libertarians, ranging all the way back to John Stuart Mill, often received Kirk’s scorn.  That is not to say that Kirk did not sometimes find comaraderie with Libertarians.  Writing as someone well acquainted with intramural doctrinal battles within Presbyterian and Reformed Christian circles, I was not surprised to see Conservatives squaring off and battling one another with incredibly ferocity.

After my November start of this book, I found myself beginning my list of “must reads.”  Happily, I already own many of Kirk’s books, but I have either only read small portions or read the books long ago.  And I have begun to search out and gather the books and works of authors who Kirk approves of.

Conservatism as a word offers no hope.  There is much in the present and more in the past that needs to be swept into the dustbin of history. One has to know what one is conserving and why.  We have to know the best of the traditions, the enduring aspects of the culture, the truths that are most in danger in order to begin the work of conservation of a good, godly Christian, and Conservative world order.

This book–read slowly and deliberately–is a good beginning.

Image result for russell kirk man and books burke

A serious weighty collection of Conservative thought which includes Kirk and many of his colleagues.

Image result for russell kirk man and books burke

This book propelled Kirk into the center of the Conservative movement in its early stages and remains a key work on the mind and movement.

Related image

Kirk’s study of T. S. Eliot–poet, essaying, Christian Humanist.

Image result for russell kirk man and books burke

A feast set with Kirk’s books.